Capacity at Risk
Definition
Capacity at Risk is a predictive metric that estimates how much sales capacity you're likely to lose to attrition in the next quarter, based on historical patterns.
Why It Matters
- Proactive planning: Know hiring needs before capacity is lost
- Budget forecasting: Anticipate backfill costs
- Risk management: Identify when attrition risk is elevated
- Scenario planning: Model best-case, baseline, and worst-case futures
Formula
Three Prediction Methods
Capacity at Risk uses historical attrition rates applied to next quarter's beginning capacity:
Capacity at Risk = Next Quarter Beginning Capacity × Historical Attrition Rate
Three methods provide a range estimate:
- Trailing 4 Quarters (Baseline) ⭐ - Most balanced
- Prior Quarter - Most recent trend
- Same Quarter Last Year - Accounts for seasonality
Worked Example: North America East
Starting Point
- Current Quarter: Q4 2025
- Next Quarter (Q1 2026) Beginning Capacity: $7.0M
- Standard Quarterly Quota: $300K per rep
METHOD 1: Trailing 4 Quarters (Baseline) ⭐
Step 1: Sum total capacity at start of each quarter
Q1 2025 BoQ: $11.0M
Q2 2025 BoQ: $9.5M
Q3 2025 BoQ: $8.7M
Q4 2025 BoQ: $7.7M
-----------------------
Total: $37.0M
Step 2: Sum total attrition over 4 quarters
Q1 loss: $1.8M
Q2 loss: $1.2M
Q3 loss: $1.2M
Q4 loss: $0.8M
-----------------------
Total: $5.0M
Step 3: Calculate effective quarterly attrition rate
Rate = Total Attrition / Total Starting Capacity
Rate = $5.0M / $37.0M = 13.5%
Step 4: Apply to next quarter
Q1 2026 starting capacity = $7.0M
Predicted Q1 2026 attrition = $7.0M × 13.5% = $945K
Result: $945K at risk (3 people equivalent)
METHOD 2: Prior Quarter (Recent Trend)
Step 1: Get prior quarter attrition rate
Q4 loss: $0.8M
Q4 BoQ: $7.7M
Rate = $0.8M / $7.7M = 10.4%
Step 2: Apply to next quarter
Q1 2026 starting capacity = $7.0M
Predicted Q1 2026 attrition = $7.0M × 10.4% = $728K
Result: $728K at risk (optimistic - assumes Q4 trend continues)
METHOD 3: Same Quarter Last Year (Seasonality)
Step 1: Get Q1 2025 attrition rate
Q1 2025 loss: $1.8M
Q1 2025 BoQ: $11.0M
Rate = $1.8M / $11.0M = 16.4%
Step 2: Apply to next quarter
Q1 2026 starting capacity = $7.0M
Predicted Q1 2026 attrition = $7.0M × 16.4% = $1.148M
Result: $1.148M at risk (conservative - Q1 often has higher attrition)
Range Summary
| Method | Rate | Predicted Q1'26 Attrition | People Equivalent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prior Quarter (Q4) | 10.4% | $728K | 2.4 people |
| Trailing 4Qs (baseline) | 13.5% | $945K | 3.2 people |
| Same Quarter Last Year (Q1) | 16.4% | $1.148M | 3.8 people |
Interpretation:
- Low bound: $728K (if recent low attrition continues)
- Baseline: $945K (balanced historical average)
- High bound: $1.148M (if Q1 seasonality repeats)
When to Use Each Method
Trailing 4 Quarters ⭐ (Default)
- Best for: Baseline planning
- Use when: You want a balanced, stable estimate
- Pros: Smooths out quarterly volatility
- Cons: May lag recent trends
Prior Quarter
- Best for: Short-term forecasts
- Use when: Recent quarter was "normal"
- Pros: Most responsive to recent changes
- Cons: Can overreact to one-time events
Same Quarter Last Year
- Best for: Seasonal businesses
- Use when: You have strong seasonal patterns
- Pros: Accounts for Q1/Q4 spikes
- Cons: Assumes patterns repeat year-over-year
Headcount Equivalent
Convert dollar capacity at risk to people:
People at Risk = Capacity at Risk / Standard Quarterly Quota
Example:
Baseline Capacity at Risk: $945K
Standard Quota: $1.2M annual = $300K quarterly
People at Risk: $945K / $300K = 3.15 ≈ 3 people
⚠️ Important: This is capacity-weighted headcount, not actual departures. Losing 2 top performers could equal 3 people of capacity.
Status Thresholds
Set alert thresholds based on % of beginning capacity:
| Status | Threshold | Example ($7.0M BoQ) |
|---|---|---|
| 🟢 Good | < 10% | < $700K |
| 🟡 Warning | 10-15% | $700K - $1.05M |
| 🔴 Critical | > 15% | > $1.05M |
Current Example: $945K / $7.0M = 13.5% → 🟡 Warning
How to Use This Metric
1. Set Hiring Targets
Capacity at Risk: $945K
→ Need to hire 3-4 people next quarter
→ Assuming 2-month time-to-fill
→ Start recruiting now
2. Scenario Planning
| Scenario | Assumption | Hiring Needed |
|---|---|---|
| Optimistic | Prior Q trend (10.4%) | 2-3 hires |
| Baseline | Trailing 4Q (13.5%) | 3-4 hires |
| Conservative | Same Q LY (16.4%) | 4-5 hires |
3. Update Monthly
As the quarter progresses, update with actual attrition:
- If Q4 attrition ends higher than $0.8M, all three methods increase
- Recalculate monthly to stay current
Best Practices
- Display all three methods: Show the range, not just baseline
- Track actuals vs predicted: Validate which method is most accurate for your org
- Adjust for known events: Upcoming reorg? Comp changes? Factor those in
- Communicate uncertainty: This is a prediction, not a guarantee
- Plan for the mid-range: Budget for baseline, prepare for high
Common Pitfalls
- Treating prediction as fact: Actual attrition will vary
- Ignoring outliers: One-time mass departure skews trailing 4Q
- Not updating quarterly: Historical rates change over time
- Forgetting leaves of absence: LOA is temporary loss, not attrition
Related Terms
- Attrition Rate - Historical turnover measurement
- Unrecovered Gap - Current capacity deficit
- Backfill Planning - How to respond to predicted risk
- Hiring Planning - Building proactive hiring timelines
References
- Predictive capacity planning is standard in enterprise sales ops
- Similar to: Attrition forecast, turnover risk, capacity forecast